Our webservice offers users the opportunity to communicate with RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9 using various programming languages. Dlubal's high-level functions (HLFs) allow you to expand and simplify the WebService's functionality. In line with RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9, using our WebService makes the engineer's work easier and faster. Check it out now! This tutorial shows you how to use the C# library by means of a simple example.
In many frame and truss structures, it is no longer sufficient to use a simple member. You often have to consider cross-section weakenings or openings in solid beams. In such cases, you can use the "Surface Model" member type. It can be integrated into the model like any other member and offers all the options of a surface model. The present technical article shows the application of such a member in an existing structural system and describes the integration of member openings.
With the Steel Design add-on, you can design structural steel components in the event of fire using the simple design methods according to Eurocode 3. The component temperature at the time of the design check can be determined automatically according to the temperature-time curves specified in the standard. In addition to considering a cladding for fire protection, it is also possible for you to take account of the beneficial properties of hot-dip galvanization.
You can use the Steel Joints add-on in RFEM 6 to create and analyze steel connections using an FE model. You can control the modeling of the connections via a simple and familiar input of components. Steel joint components can be defined manually, or by using the available templates in the library. The former method is included in a previous Knowledge Base article titled “A Novel Approach to Designing Steel Joints in RFEM 6". This article will focus on the latter method; that is, it will show you how to define steel joint components using the available templates in the program’s library.
RFEM and RSTAB offer many display options in the Display Navigator. They can be completely different, depending on their function. You often have to click several times to make certain changes. If you want to optimize your work, you can create user‑defined views. In these views, you can save all specified settings. The following example illustrates this principle.
You can color the surfaces in the direction of the local z‑axis using the indicated option in the Display Navigator. By default, the side lying in the negative z-direction is colored red and the side lying in the positive z-direction is colored blue.
In RFEM and RSTAB, you can now also display and check the types of members used visually, by means of colors. To do this, an option has been integrated into the Display Navigator.
The most common causes of unstable models are failing member nonlinearities such as tension members. As the simplest example, there is a frame with supports on the column footing and moment hinges on the column head. This unstable system is stabilized by a cross bracing of tension members. In the case of load combinations with horizontal loads, the system remains stable. However, if it is loaded vertically, both tension members fail and the system becomes unstable, which causes a calculation error. You can avoid such an error by selecting the exceptional handling of failing members under "Calculate" → "Calculation Parameters" → "Global Calculation Parameters".
The classification of cross-sections according to EN 1993-1-1 using Table 5.2 is a simple method for designing the local buckling of cross-section parts. For cross-sections of cross-section class 4, it is then necessary to determine the effective cross-section properties according to EN 1993-1-5 in order to consider the influence of local buckling in the ultimate limit state designs.
In RFEM and RSTAB, it is possible to define nonlinear properties of member releases. In addition to the activity diagrams and force-deformation relationship, you also have the simple option of using signs or limit values of the internal forces as criteria for the effectiveness of the release. This way, you can specify which internal forces should be transferred at the member end.
The simplest way to model a bolt connection in RFEM 5 is to define a node in the center of a hole, then connect it by means of internal members to the surface.
The previous article, titled Lateral-Torsional Buckling in Timber Construction | Examples 1, explains the practical application for determining the critical bending moment Mcrit or the critical bending stress σcrit for a bending beam's lateral buckling using simple examples. In this article, the critical bending moment is determined by considering an elastic foundation resulting from a stiffening bracing.
Reinforced concrete surface design for slabs, plates, and walls is possible in the RF-CONCRETE Surfaces module according to the ACI 318-19 or the CSA A23.3-19 standard. A common approach for slab design is the use of design strips for determining the average one-way internal forces over the width of the strip. This design strip method essentially takes a two-way slab element and applies a simpler one-way approach to determine the required reinforcement needed along the strip length.
The beam is resting on the column, and the beam ends at the outer edge of the column. These requirements can be fulfilled easily in an architectural model with solids. In member analysis, simplified line models are used in which center lines meet in a common node. In this article, the influence of member eccentricities on the determination of internal forces is shown on three simple models.
When evaluating line support forces, implausible diagrams sometimes arise at first glance. In particular, for variable loads at locations that also have a nodal support, at division points and edge locations of supported lines, the results sometimes show unexpected support reactions. Using the function of the linear smooth distribution in Project Navigator – Display does not always lead to the expected result diagram.
Influence lines are less important nowadays due to fast computer systems. However, it might be an advantage to use influence lines in the phase of preliminary design, as well as in the actual creation of the structural designs. With the RF-INFLUENCE add-on module, influence lines and influence surfaces can be generated and evaluated easily due to a fixed internal force. This technical article describes, with a simple example, the basics of determining and evaluating influence lines.
There are several options for calculating a semi-rigid composite beam. They differ primarily in the type of modeling. Whereas the Gamma method ensures simple modeling, additional efforts are required when using other methods (for example, shear analogy) for the modeling which are, however, offset by the much more flexible application compared to the Gamma method.
With RF-PUNCH Pro, the punching shear design can be performed according to 6.4, EN 1992-1-1. In the following example, the design according to DIN EN 1992-1-1 will be presented first with automatic design of the inner and outer perimeters and then on the basis of the inner perimeters defined by the user on a simple example.
In practice, an engineer often faces the task of representing the support conditions as close to the reality as possible in order to be able to analyze the deformations and internal forces of the structure subjected to their influence and to enable construction that is as cost efficient as possible. RFEM and RSTAB provide numerous options for defining nonlinear nodal supports. This second part describes the options for creating a nonlinear support for a restraint and provides a simple example. For a better understanding, the result is always compared to a linearly defined support.
The efficient design of prestressed structural components requires a few additional steps that go beyond the standard reinforced concrete design, from modeling tendons to the calculation of equivalent loads to the cross-section resistance design. Therefore, it is important that the software for prestressed concrete design is structured and the navigation is possible in the program. RFEM 5, with two add-on modules, RF-TENDON and RF-TENDON Design, fulfills these requirements and allows engineers to carry out the complete design of prestressed beams, frames, plates, buildings, and bridges according to EN 1992‑1‑1 with National Annexes and SIA 262.
RFEM and RSTAB provide numerous options for nonlinear definitions of nodal supports. With regard to an earlier article, further possibilities of the nonlinear support design for a movable support are shown in a simple example in this article. For a better understanding, the result is always compared to a linearly defined support.
In practice, an engineer often faces the task of representing the support conditions as close to the reality as possible in order to be able to analyze the deformations and internal forces of the structure subjected to their influence and to enable construction that is as cost-effective as possible. RFEM and RSTAB provide numerous options for defining nonlinear nodal supports. The first section of my article describes the options for creating a nonlinear free support and provides a simple example. For a better understanding, the result is always compared to a linearly defined support.
My previous article Result Combinations 1 explained the basic principles of result combinations on simple examples. This article describes a further application case that combines the definition options of Examples 1 and 2. Likewise, the effort should be compared to a combination by means of load combinations.
RFEM and RSTAB provide a wide range of selection options. Some of the previous posts have already described selection using "Special Selection" or tables.
In order to use the working window area optimally for the graphical input of model data or for result evaluation, there are various options for arranging Project Navigator, the table, and the result panel.